Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Note
FOREWORD
From the Editor's Desk
Invited Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Original Article
Original Research
Photoessay
Pictorial Review
Point of View
Review Article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Note
FOREWORD
From the Editor's Desk
Invited Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Original Article
Original Research
Photoessay
Pictorial Review
Point of View
Review Article
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/FH_2_2025

The transformative role of telehealth in advancing integrated behavioral healthcare: Accessibility, outcomes, and cost efficiency

, , , ,
1Department of Health Sciences and Informatics, Bangladesh Institute of Innovative Health Research, Dhaka, Mirpur, Bangladesh
2Department of Behavioral Sciences, Bangladesh Institute of Innovative Health Research, Dhaka, Mirpur, Bangladesh

*Corresponding author: Mr. MD. Faisal Ahmed, Department of Behavioral Sciences, Bangladesh Institute of Innovative Health Research, Dhaka, Mirpur, 1216, Bangladesh. faisal.biihr@gmail.com

Received: , Accepted: ,
© 2026 Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of Future Health
Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Iloanusi C, Barman M, Ahmed MD. F, Arefine R, Muna MK. The transformative role of telehealth in advancing integrated behavioral healthcare: Accessibility, outcomes, and cost efficiency. Future Health. doi: 10.25259/FH_2_2025

Abstract

Behavioral medicine, which integrates biomedical and psychosocial approaches to health, forms the cornerstone of integrated behavioral healthcare (IBH). As healthcare systems increasingly aim for person-centered and collaborative care, telehealth has emerged as a transformative tool to enhance the accessibility, efficiency, and quality of IBH services. Telehealth, defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) to deliver healthcare at a distance, has gained significant momentum—especially during the COVID-19 pandemic—bridging care gaps for underserved and remote populations. This narrative review explores the evolving role of telehealth in advancing IBH by focusing on three core dimensions: accessibility, patient engagement, and cost-effectiveness. A structured literature search was conducted across PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar through 2024, including peer-reviewed articles, institutional reports, and grey literature relevant to telehealth and integrated behavioral health. Key themes were extracted and synthesized based on relevance and contribution to the IBH model. The review finds that telehealth significantly improves access to behavioral care by eliminating geographic, economic, and social barriers. It enhances continuity and engagement through virtual communication platforms, telepsychiatry, and remote monitoring tools, thereby fostering therapeutic alliances and patient adherence. Economically, telehealth reduces travel costs, operational expenses, and healthcare utilization burdens for both providers and patients. Moreover, it strengthens collaboration among multidisciplinary teams, supports real-time data sharing through electronic health records (EHRs), and enables coordinated decision-making. Despite its benefits, telehealth faces challenges, including disparities in digital literacy, infrastructure limitations, and concerns over data privacy. Addressing these barriers through policy reform, AI integration, and improved broadband access is crucial for maximizing its potential. Telehealth stands as a critical enabler of behavioral medicine by integrating mental and physical healthcare into a cohesive, patient-centered system.

Keywords

Accessibility
Cost-effectiveness
Integrated behavioral healthcare (IBH)
Patient engagement
Telehealth

INTRODUCTION

Healthcare is increasingly becoming a technology-driven environment because of its potential to increase access to care and reduce barriers in underserved and rural areas, thereby promoting universal health coverage.1 Telehealth has been used interchangeably with terms such as telemedicine, digital health, e-health, and virtual care.2-7 While these are related, telehealth and telemedicine are distinct. Telemedicine refers specifically to remote clinical services, whereas telehealth encompasses remote nonclinical services such as provider training, continuing medical education, administrative meetings, and electronic information sharing to support assessment, diagnosis, consultation, treatment, education, and care management.8

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines telehealth as “the delivery of health care services, where patients and providers are separated by distance,” using ICT for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional education.2 Telehealth employs various technologies, including the internet, video conferencing, store-and-forward imaging, streaming media, and both landline and wireless communications.9 It has been implemented in many countries for decades, improving healthcare access, increasing speed of care, and reducing costs—particularly for remote, vulnerable, and aging populations.2,10 Notably, mental health services delivered via telehealth are found to be as effective as in-person services for various mental health concerns, maintaining the quality of clinician–client relationships11-15 These services are highly acceptable to both patients and providers, with over 80% of users in one study rating their experience with telepsychiatry as good or excellent.16,17 Despite these advantages, telehealth integration into routine care was limited before the COVID-19 pandemic.18,19 In 2009, only 2% of U.S. clinicians used telemedicine for consultations.18 From 2005 to 2017, telemedicine use increased slowly (from 0.2 to 6.57 per 1000 patients), and only 15% of surveyed physicians in 2015 reported using it in their practices.18,20 Similarly, in Australia, pre-pandemic use of telehealth for mental health services was around 1–2%.21

During the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth usage surged globally, becoming essential for quarantined populations to access real-time care.10,22-24 In the U.S., mental health services via telehealth rose from 1% pre-pandemic to 53–59% by April 2020.25 In Australia, by the end of 2021, 15–20% of mental health services were delivered via videoconference and 9–15% via telephone.21 A WHO report confirmed telehealth as the most adopted modality during the pandemic.26 Continued high rates of telehealth use for behavioral health services have been documented post-pandemic as well.25,27 Behavioral medicine, a foundational element of integrated behavioral healthcare (IBH), emphasizes the interplay between biological, psychological, and social factors in health and disease. The Lexicon for Behavioral Health and Primary Care Integration defines IBH as coordinated care from primary and behavioral health clinicians using a systematic, cost-effective approach tailored to individual needs.9 Although telehealth has been applied in various physical and mental healthcare contexts,28-36 limited literature explores its role in IBH. This review aims to examine how telehealth is transforming IBH, focusing on its influence on access, treatment outcomes, and cost-effectiveness.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study uses data sourced from peer-reviewed articles and reports in the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar databases up to 2024 [Figure 1]. Moreover, peer-reviewed articles derived from the gray literature, such as institutional reports and conference proceedings, were consulted to obtain alternative and multiple viewpoints pertaining to telehealth as well as IBH. Regional newspapers and magazines, especially those accredited by national health and research boards, were also taken into consideration to capture regional points of view. For this purpose, the literature was searched via keywords such as ‘telehealth’, ‘integrated behavioral health care’, ‘mental health services’, and ‘digital health solutions.’ The inclusion of key studies was guided by their relevance to IBH and telehealth care models.

Flow chart of study selection in narrative review.
Figure 1:
Flow chart of study selection in narrative review.

BENIFITS OF TELEHEALTH IN INTEGRATED BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE

Telehealth has become a modern technique for delivering healthcare solutions by addressing challenges typically faced in conventional care systems. This is especially evident in IBH, where timely and accessible mental health services are crucial. Telehealth leverages technology to bridge gaps in care, enabling broader access regardless of location or socioeconomic status. This section highlights three key benefits of telehealth in IBH: improved access to care, enhanced patient engagement and continuity, and cost-effectiveness.

Improved access to care

Access to care refers to the timely use of health services for achieving optimal outcomes. Rural populations often struggle with delays and poor outcomes due to physician shortages, provider burnout, and geographic isolation.1 For example, Ward et al. noted that 75% of rural family physicians had to cover emergency departments, discouraging many from practicing in these areas.37 Telehealth mitigates these challenges by providing remote access to mental health services. It reduces travel time and empowers patients to manage chronic conditions more effectively.38-42 Telepsychiatry has especially increased access to mental health services where geography and financial constraints limit availability. Studies show that 94.7% of patients using telepsychiatry did not require follow-up crisis interventions.43,44

Telehealth enhances flexibility in scheduling, reduces transportation or childcare needs, and lowers stigma-related fears of being seen in a clinic. It also decreases missed appointments and wait times, while improving the overall quality and timeliness of care.32-36,40,45,46 Moreover, it allows access to culturally competent providers—across race, gender, and sexual orientation—and strengthens healthcare workforce retention and specialty access in rural areas.1,47

Enhanced engagement and continuity of care

Telehealth significantly improves patient engagement and supports continuity in behavioral health care. Consistent communication between patients and providers fosters adherence and long-term outcomes. In a study by Haxhihamza et al., 80.22% of patients expressed satisfaction with the transition to telehealth, citing financial benefits, accessibility, and convenience.41 Similarly, Severe et al. reported that 54.1% of patients intended to continue using telepsychiatry even when in-person visits became available.48 Surveys of mental health providers—including psychiatrists, psychologists, and nurse practitioners—indicated that telehealth improved scheduling, convenience, and clinical communication. It also enabled better mood assessments and video-based consultations.49

Telehealth’s continuity benefits are particularly evident in rural or underserved settings. Compared with in-person care, reduced travel time and increased convenience lead to better attendance and more relaxed patient environments. This contributes to accurate assessments and stronger therapeutic relationships.50-53 Many patients prefer virtual care for these reasons, suggesting telehealth may outperform traditional care models in some contexts.53

Cost-effectiveness

Cost barriers—especially travel expenses and lost productivity—remain major concerns in rural health care.54 Telehealth addresses these by allowing patients to receive care at home, reducing direct and indirect costs. It also decreases healthcare system expenditures by minimizing staffing needs and lowering missed appointment rates.1,37,46 In some settings, therapist fees are equivalent across telehealth and in-person formats, but broader cost advantages make telehealth more affordable. For instance, patients with bulimia nervosa found teletherapy more cost-effective than in-person sessions due to reduced travel costs, especially in large geographical areas.55

Thus, telehealth offers substantial economic benefits by reducing both individual and system-level expenses, particularly for underserved and remote populations. Its cost efficiency, alongside improved access and engagement, highlights its critical role in advancing IBH.

TELEHEALTH’S ROLE IN ENHANCING COLLABORATION IN IBH

Telehealth, as a transformative digital solution, is essential for strengthening collaboration within Integrated Behavioral Health (IBH) by improving care coordination and communication among healthcare providers. This integration fosters a more cohesive approach to treating both mental and physical health needs, particularly in response to the growing demand for accessible, efficient healthcare systems.

Provider collaboration and communication

Telehealth supports IBH’s team-based care by enabling real-time interaction among primary care and behavioral health professionals via video conferencing.56 It promotes a collaborative atmosphere by enhancing communication among patients, doctors, and families through tools such as email, social media, and wikis that improve stakeholder participation and information exchange.57 Wearable devices and smartphone apps further empower patients to manage their health actively, increasing their sense of security and satisfaction.58 While challenges remain—such as technology limitations—telehealth programs have shown success in increasing medication adherence and improving overall patient well-being.59

Data integration and decision support

Telehealth plays a crucial role in integrating patient data across mental and physical health services through technologies like Health Information Exchange (HIE), which compiles data from various electronic health records (EHRs) to offer a unified view of patients’ health.60 Secure, bidirectional sharing of diagnoses, medications, and treatment histories supports comprehensive care delivery. Studies also suggest that telehealth facilitates clinician documentation and data sharing through EHR platforms.60,61 Additionally, clinical decision support systems integrated within telemedicine enhance outcomes and streamline workflows.62

Advanced telehealth platforms incorporate visual analytics and natural language processing to interpret large volumes of patient data—including vital signs and lifestyle patterns—enabling real-time clinical decisions.63 The integration of multimodal health information, such as speech, movement, and biological data, allows for more comprehensive assessments of mental and physical health, assisting with early diagnosis and monitoring.64

Remote monitoring and care coordination

Remote monitoring is another core element of telehealth in IBH, supporting continuous health management, timely interventions, and improved treatment adherence. For example, Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) has been linked to decreased uncontrolled hypertension (from 66.3% to 40.2%) after 90 days and an average improvement of 7.3 mmHg in systolic blood pressure.65 It also correlates with reduced 36-month all-cause mortality rates among patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (18.9% vs. 25.3%).66 RPM enables real-time monitoring and swift clinical responses to worsening health conditions, thereby enhancing quality of life and disease control.67 In rural areas, telehealth bridges the gap where behavioral health specialists are scarce, allowing primary care providers to consult with off-site behavioral health managers through collaborative care models.68 These virtual models improve treatment for conditions like anxiety and depression by promoting continuous coordination despite geographic barriers.

Even though telehealth has substantially advanced integration and communication within IBH, challenges such as workforce shortages and reimbursement policies remain barriers to realizing its full potential in behavioral health care.69

LIMITATIONS AND CHALLENGES

Telemedicine is an innovative system that enables access to healthcare from remote areas through telecommunications technology. During the COVID-19 era, it became a globally popular mode of care, allowing patients to consult experts via video calls, healthcare software, and online portals.70,71 Despite these advancements, telemedicine services remain inaccessible to many due to several interrelated barriers.

Digital literacy and age disparities

A significant limitation is the digital literacy gap across age groups. Elderly patients often struggle to operate mobile devices and computers, unlike the younger generation, who find them intuitive.70,72-73 Due to a lack of technological proficiency, many individuals avoid seeking digital medical assistance altogether72-75

Rural-urban divide and infrastructure deficits

People in rural areas are often unaware of telemedicine services or lack the means to access them.71,76 They face significant barriers, such as insufficient device ownership, slow internet connectivity, language barriers, limited electricity access, and a shortage of trained personnel.57,70,72,75,77-79 Consequently, telemedicine remains concentrated in urban centers. Socioeconomic status further impacts usage, with upper-class individuals being the primary beneficiaries.70,78,80

Gender disparities and provider limitations

Gender-related preferences also influence telehealth usage. During the COVID-19 pandemic, females were found to use telemedicine services more frequently than males.70 On the provider side, many healthcare professionals lack familiarity with online systems or the necessary tools for effective virtual consultations, such as hotlines and stable platforms.57,70-73,75-79,81,82

Privacy and regulatory concerns

Patient data privacy remains a significant concern. Telemedicine involves sensitive content such as images, videos, and health records.80 To protect patient information, systems should use unique identifiers and secure storage mechanisms. Ethical approvals and WHO guidelines must be followed.80 Many platforms lack robust policies for data protection and often store health records in physical registers, exposing them to privacy breaches.57,79,80,82 It is essential to enforce policies requiring consent before sharing patient data and to develop centralized, secure information systems.72,79

Limitations in clinical practice

Telemedicine also poses limitations in clinical practice. It does not allow physical examinations, clinical trials, or sample collection. As a result, doctors may struggle with accurate diagnosis, and patients may miss out on urgent interventions or essential support.72 Furthermore, patients’ self-reported data can introduce bias and limit clinical accuracy.73-75 Many women still prefer in-person visits due to concerns about privacy, security, and trust.82 In some cultural settings, digital healthcare services are discouraged or prohibited.57,72

Recommendations for future research and adoption

To improve the system, structural equation modeling (SEM) can be used for quantitative assessment of influencing factors, while focus group discussions (FGDs) can explore attitudes across age groups.70,71 Prior studies on adults are scarce, especially in developing countries like Bangladesh, where adoption remains low.70,73,75-79 Feedback collection from users and targeted campaigns through SMS or mHealth promotions may increase public engagement.71,77,78

This study clearly shows that telemedicine remains out of reach for underserved populations in developing countries such as Bangladesh.70,73,75,77 Addressing literacy, infrastructure, and regulatory issues is crucial to expanding its accessibility and equity.

FUTURE PROSPECTS OF TELEHEALTH IN IBH

Telehealth services were largely unfamiliar to the population of Bangladesh prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Since then, they have become more recognized among both urban and rural residents. Despite prevailing constraints, the adoption of telehealth in the country continues to expand, offering strong potential to enhance integrated healthcare delivery systems.

Capacity building and stakeholder engagement

To accelerate telehealth expansion, comprehensive training programs should be organized. Government bodies and NGOs must be actively engaged in implementing and promoting telehealth initiatives. In addition to involvement from the medical field, collaboration with experts in information technology is essential. Active participation from professional associations, coordinated intersectoral efforts, and structured educational support for practicing clinicians are necessary to integrate telehealth into routine healthcare delivery.83

Policy reforms and legal frameworks

For successful scaling, legislative frameworks must be reliable, rigid, and well-structured. Attention should be paid to policies that make telehealth cost-effective and time-efficient. For example, the Center for Connected Health Policy provides legal resources, and during COVID-19, the Uniform Emerging Volunteer Health Practitioner Act offered free care through licensed professionals.84 Such policy actions should be encouraged and replicated in future healthcare emergencies.

Digital infrastructure and connectivity

One of the most critical challenges in Bangladesh remains the lack of broadband internet, especially in rural, suburban, and fringe areas. To address this, consistent investment in infrastructure—including network coverage, electricity supply, and internet accessibility—is necessary.85 Strengthening digital infrastructure at both the community and tertiary levels will ensure equitable access to telehealth.86 Additionally, telecom providers should consider cost adjustments to promote service uptake, while governments and NGOs should be engaged in expanding digital reach.

Technology integration and AI advancement

The integration of advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT) offers immense potential. AI-generated chatbots and virtual assistants can assess patient symptoms and diagnostic reports to provide personalized recommendations. For example, AI image recognition in tele-eye-care systems can help address the shortage of ophthalmologists.87 These tools not only support service providers but also increase user engagement.

IoT-based applications can simulate patient loads, prevent system failures, gather patient feedback, and improve technical feasibility.88 Ensuring reliable service delivery, even during internet disruptions, will depend on the use of IoT and cloud computing systems.89 These technologies collectively enhance service quality, efficiency, and real-time responsiveness.

Reimbursement structures and quality assurance

To make telehealth sustainable, reimbursement models should be tailored across various settings—hospital-affiliated, independent practice, and safety-net clinics. Long-term reimbursement policies must reflect actual service costs, promote equitable access, and reduce administrative burdens on providers.90 The perceived quality and authenticity of services—especially related to digital prescriptions—should be continually monitored to maintain patient trust.85

Expanding service scope and cultural acceptance

To optimize telehealth’s reach, services such as virtual physical therapy can be added to address conditions like cardiovascular, pulmonary, musculoskeletal, and neurological disorders. Durable medical equipment, home evaluation, and follow-up care should be incorporated into the telehealth model.91-92 Telehealth must also be tailored to cultural and gender-specific needs, ensuring security and trust for women and culturally diverse communities.82

Policies regarding ethics, licensing, fraud protection, and cybersecurity must be reinforced. Legislative reforms should support the smooth integration of telehealth into IBH while upholding data privacy and system interoperability.

In summary, by addressing technological, legal, and social barriers and integrating AI, IoT, and supportive policy frameworks, telehealth can be transformed into a robust and sustainable model for IBH These key insights are consolidated in Figure 2, which illustrates the cyclical relationship between the benefits of telehealth, systemic challenges, and proposed strategic enhancements in IBH.

Telehealth in integrated behavioral healthcare: key benefits, challenges, and strategic enhancements.
Figure 2:
Telehealth in integrated behavioral healthcare: key benefits, challenges, and strategic enhancements.

CONCLUSION

Telehealth has emerged as a pivotal force in the delivery of IBH, improving not only access and affordability but also the overall quality of mental health services. As an application of ICT, telehealth enhances patient-provider relationships by overcoming traditional barriers such as distance, stigma, and socioeconomic limitations. Its capacity to deliver continuous, personalized, and patient-centered care strengthens therapeutic alliances and supports active participation in the healing process. Economically, telehealth reduces costs for both patients and providers without compromising service quality. Innovations like telepsychiatry and remote monitoring facilitate timely, culturally responsive care, particularly for underserved populations. However, critical challenges persist, including infrastructural gaps, digital illiteracy, and privacy concerns, which hinder universal adoption. To unlock telehealth’s full potential, targeted strategies are needed—such as expanding broadband coverage, enforcing robust data protection policies, and integrating AI-based tools. Structured reimbursement models and stakeholder engagement are equally vital. Ultimately, telehealth not only represents the future of IBH but also lays the foundation for a unified, body-and-mind approach to equitable and effective healthcare delivery.

Author contributions

CI: Investigation, methodology, writing-original draft, data curation, formal analysis, project administration; MB: Investigation, methodology, writing-original draft, data curation, formal analysis, validation; MFA: Conceptualization, investigation, methodology, writing-original draft, writing-review & editing; RA: Investigation, methodology, writing-original draft, data curation; MKM: Investigation, methodology, writing-original draft, data curation.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent

Patient’s consent not required as patients identity is not disclosed or compromised.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that they have used artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology solely for language editing and refinement purposes, including improving grammar, sentence structure, and overall clarity of the manuscript. No AI assistance was employed for data analysis, interpretation of results, generation of scientific content, or image creation. All scientific content, analyses, and conclusions were entirely developed, reviewed, and approved by the authors.

References

  1. , . Telehealth interventions and outcomes across rural communities in the United States: Narrative review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23:e29575.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  2. . Global diffusion of eHealth: making universal health coverage achievable: report of the third global survey on eHealth. World Health Organization; .
  3. , , , , , , et al. What is telemedicine? A collection of 104 peer-reviewed perspectives and theoretical underpinnings. Telemed J E Health. 2007;13:573-90.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , . The Internet versus the telephone: What is telehealth anyway? Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2000;31:490-2.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . What is eHealth (3): A systematic review of published definitions. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7:e1.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , . Telehealth. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1585-92.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . A digital embrace to blunt the curve of COVID19 pandemic. NPJ Digit Med. 2020;3:64.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. American Academy of Family Physicians, ed. Telehealth and telemedicine. AAFP. 2022. https://www.aafp.org/about/policies/all/telehealth-telemedicine.html [Last accessed 2024 Nov 29]
  9. Health Resources and Services Administration, ed. What is telehealth? HRSA. 2022. https://www.hrsa.gov/telehealth/what-is-telehealth [Last accessed 2024 Nov 29].
  10. Noncommunicable Diseases, Rehabilitation and Disability (NCD). WHO-ITU global standard for accessibility of telehealth services. 2022. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240050464 [Last accessed 2024 Nov 29].
  11. , , , , , , et al. The clinical effectiveness of telehealth: A systematic review of meta-analyses from 2010 to 2019. J Telemed Telecare. 2023;29:669-84.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , . The empirical evidence for telemedicine interventions in mental disorders. Telemed J E Health. 2016;22:87-113.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , et al. The effectiveness of telehealth versus face-to face interventions for anxiety disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2024;30:250-61.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , et al. Videoconferencing psychotherapy and depression: A systematic review. Telemed J E Health. 2019;25:435-46.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , . The current state of telehealth evidence: A rapid review. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018;37:1975-82.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , . Patient attitudes toward telepsychiatry during the COVID-19 pandemic: A nationwide, multisite survey. JMIR Ment Health. 2020;7:e24761.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , . A systematic review of providers’ attitudes toward telemental health via videoconferencing. Clin Psychology: Sci Pract. 2020;27
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , , , et al. The relationship between therapeutic alliance, frequency of consultation and uptake of telemedicine among patients seeking treatment for early psychosis: A moderated mediation model. Digit Health. 2024;10:20552076241247194.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , . The COVID-19 pandemic: The ‘black swan’ for mental health care and a turning point for e-health. Internet Interventions. 2020;20:100317.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  20. Men J. Lack of reimbursement barrier to telehealth adoption. AJMC - Managed care news, research, and expert insights. https://www.ajmc.com/view/lack-of-reimbursement-barrier-to-telehealth-adoption Published July 30, 2020. [Last accessed 2024 Nov 29].
  21. , , , , . Increase in telemental health services on the medicare benefits schedule after the start of the coronavirus pandemic: Data from 2019 to 2021. Aust Health Rev. 2022;46:544-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. . Telemedicine lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2022;22:1-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , . COVID-19 outbreak control, example of ministry of health of Turkey. Turk J Med Sci. 2020;50:489-94.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. . Virtual health care in the era of COVID-19. Lancet. 2020;395:1180-1.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , . Trends in use of telehealth for behavioral health care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Considerations for payers and employers. Am J Health Promot. 2022;36:1237-41.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  26. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on noncommunicable disease resources and services: Results of a rapid assessment n.d. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240010291.
  27. , , , , , , et al. Telehealth and In-person behavioral health services in rural communities before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: Multisite prospective cohort study. JMIR Ment Health. 2023;10:e47047.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  28. , . An introduction to primary care and psychology. Am Psychol. 2014;69:325-31.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. , , . Mental health-related physician office visits by adults aged 18 and over: United States, 2012-2014. NCHS Data Brief 2018:1-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , , , , et al. Telehealth in urology: A systematic review of the literature how much can telemedicine be useful during and after the COVID-19 pandemic? Eur Urol. 2020;78:786-811.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  31. , . Glitches in the utilization of telehealth in pediatric rheumatology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2020;18:78.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  32. , . Telenephrology application in rural and remote areas of Jordan: Benefits and impact on quality of life. Rural Remote Health. 2016;16:3646.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. , , , , , , et al. Evaluation of human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C telemedicine clinics. Am J Manag Care. 2012;18:207-12.
    [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. , . Telehealth as adjunctive therapy in insulin pump treated patients: A pilot study. Pract Diab Int. 2010;27:9.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. , , , , , , et al. Utilizing remote real-time videoconferencing to expand access to cancer genetic services in community practices: A multicenter feasibility study. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18:e23.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  36. , , , , , . Use of a text message program to raise type 2 diabetes risk awareness and promote health behavior change (part i): Assessment of participant reach and adoption. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15:e281.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  37. , , , , , , et al. Use of telemedicine for ED physician coverage in critical access hospitals increased after CMS policy clarification. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018;37:2037-44.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. , , , , , . Patients’ satisfaction with and preference for telehealth visits. J GEN INTERN MED. 2016;31:269-75.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  39. , , , , , , et al. Conversations on telemental health: Listening to remote and rural first nations communities. Rural Remote Health. 2011;11:1656.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. , , , , , , et al. Formative evaluation of a telemedicine model for delivering clinical neurophysiology services part i: Utility, technical performance and service provider perspective. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010;10:48.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  41. , , , , , , et al. Patient satisfaction with use of telemedicine in university clinic of psychiatry: Skopje, North macedonia during COVID-19 pandemic. Telemed J E Health. 2021;27:464-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. , , , , , . Telehealth and patient satisfaction: A systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e016242.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  43. , , . Patient perspectives on telepsychiatry on the inpatient psychiatric unit during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Patient Exp. 2020;7:677-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  44. , . Effectiveness of teleconsultation use in access to mental health services during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in the dominican republic. Indian J Psychiatry. 2020;62:S492-4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  45. , , , , , , et al. The provision of counseling to patients receiving medications for opioid use disorder: Telehealth innovations and challenges in the age of COVID-19. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021;120:108163.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  46. , . Feasibility and acceptability of mobile epilepsy educational system (MEES) for people with epilepsy in Malaysia. Telemed J E Health. 2012;18:777-84.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  47. , , , , . Breaking down barriers: Young adult interest and use of telehealth for behavioral health services. R I Med J (2013). 2022;105:26-31.
    [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. , , , , , . Factors influencing patients’ initial decisions regarding telepsychiatry participation during the COVID-19 pandemic: Telephone-based survey. JMIR Form Res. 2020;4:e25469.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  49. , , , , , , et al. Going virtual during a pandemic: An academic psychiatry department’s experience with telepsychiatry. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2025;51:59-68.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. , , , , , . Suddenly becoming a “Virtual Doctor”: Experiences of psychiatrists transitioning to telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. PS. 2020;71:1143-50.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. , , , . A systematic review of the use of telepsychiatry in depression. Community Ment Health J. 2021;57:93-100.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  52. , , , , , , et al. Motivation and use of telehealth among people with depression in the United States. J Prim Care Community Health. 2024;15:21501319241266515.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  53. , , . Virtual behavioral health treatment satisfaction and outcomes across time. J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2022;9:158-65.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  54. , , . Systematic review of patient and caregivers’ satisfaction with telehealth videoconferencing as a mode of service delivery in managing patients’ health. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0221848.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  55. , , , , , , et al. Telehealth Versus Face-to-face psychotherapy for less common mental health conditions: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JMIR Ment Health. 2022;9:e31780.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  56. . Platforms for collaborative process. In: Fundamentals of telemedicine and telehealth Fundamentals of telemedicine and telehealth. Elsevier; . p. :93-113.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. , , , , . Telepsychiatry and other technologies for integrated care: Evidence base, best practice models and competencies. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2018;30:292-309.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. , , , , , , et al. Impact of remote monitoring on patients’ quality of life a single centre study. J Hypertens. 2024;42:e154-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. , , , , , , et al. Telehealth in hypertension management: Remote monitoring, adherence, and patient outcomes. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2023;11:387-91.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. . Telemedicine and health information exchange: An opportunity for integration. In: Telemedicine, telehealth and telepresence Telemedicine, telehealth and telepresence. Springer International Publishing; . p. :63-76.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. , , , . The critical role of health information technology in the safe integration of behavioral health and primary care to improve patient care. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2022;49:221-30.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  62. , , , . Advancing ubiquitous collaboration for telehealth – A framework to evaluate technology-mediated collaborative workflow for telehealth, hypertension exam workflow study. J Pharmacol Pharm Res. 2022;5
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Chen CY, Huang HH, Wu CY, Kuo LT, Shih SY, Lai P. Telehealth data-derived visual analytics for health informatics applications in coordinated care of patients with multiple comorbidities. 2022 IEEE Biomed. Circuits Syst. Conf. BioCAS, Taipei, Taiwan: IEEE; 2022, p. 444–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/BioCAS54905.2022.9948673.
  64. . Multimodal technologies for remote assessment of neurological and mental health. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024;67:4233-45.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  65. , , , , , . Remote patient monitoring is associated with improved outcomes in hypertension: A large, retrospective, cohort analysis. Healthcare (Basel). 2024;12:1583.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  66. , , , , , , et al. Remote monitoring is an independent predictor of better survival in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Europace. 2024;26
    [Google Scholar]
  67. , . Remote monitoring in telehealth: Advancements, feasibility and implications. In: Biomedical engineering, A comprehensive overview of telemedicine Biomedical engineering, A comprehensive overview of telemedicine. IntechOpen; .
    [Google Scholar]
  68. , , , , . Remote collaborative care with off-site behavioral health care managers: A systematic review of clinical trials. J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry. 2022;63:71-85.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. , , , . Digitally driven integrated primary care and behavioral health: How technology can expand access to effective treatment. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2017;19:86.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. , . Growth in telehealth use in Bangladesh from 2019-2021 - A difference-in-differences approach. J Medicine. 2022;23:42-7.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  71. , , , . Exploring patient response towards hotline-based telemedicine service in Bangladesh. Inform Med Unlocked. 2023;39:101242.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  72. , , , . An exploratory cross-sectional study of awareness and barriers to adoption of telemedicine services among patients in Bangladesh. Future Health. 2024;2:107-13.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  73. , . Impact of telehealth in Bangladesh during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Curr Res Integr Med. 2021;6:9-12.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. , , , , , . What drives people’s behavioral intention toward telemedicine? An emerging economy perspective. Sage Open. 2023;13
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Ferdous AM. Scopes and challenges of implementing telemedicine in a developing country like Bangladesh. Master thesis. UiT Norges arktiske universitet, 2017.
  76. , , , , , , et al. Factors associated with the intention of telehealth service utilization among Bangladeshi people: A cross-sectional study. F1000Res. 2024;11:996.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  77. , , , , , , et al. Use of telemedicine in Bangladesh: Current status and future prospects. North Am Acad Res. 2022;5:1-13.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Sarker A, Hoque. Adoption of ICT-based Health Services in Northern Regions of Bangladesh: Challenges and prospects. Bogra-5842, Bangladesh: Rural Development Academy (RDA); 2016.
  79. , , . Telemedicine healthcare service adoption barriers in rural Bangladesh. AJIS. 2020;24
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  80. . Telemedicine: An innovative twist to primary health care in rural Bangladesh. J Prim Care Community Health. 2020;11:2150132720950519.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  81. . The rising tide of non-communicable diseases in Bangladesh: The role of lifestyle changes . 2024 https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/7ws6y.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. , , , . Telehealth interventions to improve diabetes management among black and hispanic patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022;9:2375-86.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  83. , , , . Ethical practice in telehealth and telemedicine. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32:1136-40.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  84. , , . The regulatory environment of telemedicine after COVID-19. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022;10:2500-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  85. , , , , , , et al. Perceptions and barriers regarding telemedicine services among Bangladeshi young adults in the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative exploration. Asian J Health Sci. 2020;6
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  86. , , , . Patients’ experiences with tele-mental health services during COVID-19 in Pakistan. East Mediterr Health J. 2024;30:283-391.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. , , , , , . Portable health clinic: An advanced tele-healthcare system for unreached communities. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;264:616-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. , . IoHT based tele-healthcare support system for feasibility and perfor-mance analysis. JES. 2024;20:844-50.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  89. , , , , , . Reliable service delivery in Tele-health care systems. Journal of Network and Computer Applications. 2018;115:86-93.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  90. Sandalow, Harris J, Curtis M, Sarafini M. Positioning telehealth policy to ensure high-quality, Cost-effective care. Bipartisan Policy Center; 2024.
  91. , , , , , , et al. Health system-level evaluation of tele-mental health services among children and adolescents in Ontario, Canada. Can J Psychiatry. 2022;67:462-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  92. , . Virtual physical therapy and telerehabilitation. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2021;32:419-28.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
401

PDF downloads
127
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections

Suggested read for related articles: