Translate this page into:
Household Survey to Evaluate the Coverage of Mass Drug Administration for the Lymphatic Filariasis in District Umaria, Madhya Pradesh, India in Year 2023
Corresponding Author Dr Akash Ranjan Singh Assistant Professor Department of Community Medicine Birsa Munda Government Medical College Shahdol, M.P. Email ID: akashranjan02@gmail.com
-
Received: ,
Accepted: ,
How to cite: Kabirpanthi V, Singh AR, Kahar P et al. Household Survey to Evaluate the Coverage of Mass Drug Administration for the Lymphatic Filariasis in District Umaria, Madhya Pradesh, India in Year 2023. Future Health 2023; 1(1):8-16.
Abstract
Background:
In 2023, the Umaria district in Madhya Pradesh, India, was identified as an endemic district for Lymphatic Filariasis (LF). The National Programme for Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis conducted annual mass drug administration (MDA) campaigns in February to eliminate LF by 2027.
Objective:
This study aimed to estimate the coverage and compliance rate of MDA in the Umaria district of Madhya Pradesh, India, in 2023.
Methodology:
A cluster sampling method was used for evaluation. The district was divided into three implementation units, corresponding to its three administrative blocks. Four clusters were selected within each unit, consisting of one urban and three rural clusters. Thirty households were randomly selected as respondents from each cluster. Data was collected in May 2023 using a standardized coverage evaluation form designed by the World Health Organization.
Result:
Among the 360 households surveyed, information on 1606 beneficiaries was obtained. MDA was offered to 94% of the total population, with a coverage and compliance rate of 98.5% among the eligible population. The most common reasons for not consuming the drugs were "not present at house during the campaign" and "fear of drugs." Less than one percent of beneficiaries reported any side effects following the consumption of MDA.
Conclusion & Implication:
The coverage and compliance of MDA in the district appear to be optimal. The National Programme for Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis should now consider conducting Transmission Assessment Surveys to determine the endemicity of districts that have reached the critical threshold of LF infection. Additionally, establishing adequate sentinel sites, organizing night blood examination camps in endemic areas, and improving Information Education Communication activities may aid in achieving LF elimination by 2027.
Keywords
Mass drug administration
Lymphatic filariasis
MDA coverage evaluation
cluster sampling
Introduction
Lymphatic filariasis (LF) is an avoidable, debilitating, disfiguring disease caused by infection with the filarial parasites Wuchereria bancrofti, Brugia malayi, and B. timori, infecting more than half a million people worldwide annually.1 While many infections are asymptomatic, around one-third of individuals experience clinical manifestations such as hydrocele, lymphe-dema, and acute adenolymphangitis episodes.2,3 The clinical disease impairs individuals' productivity and limits their educational and employ-ment opportunities, often subjecting them to stigmatisation and discrimi- nation.4-6
The Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis was established in 1997 in response to a resolution by the World Health Assembly, with the World Health Organization (WHO) recommending mass drug administration (MDA) as a key strategy for LF elimination.7,8 MDA involves treating all eligible individuals residing in endemic areas.9 In India, the smallest administrative unit for MDA implementation is an administrative block, chosen based on the esti-mated prevalence of LF infection sufficient for transmission.9 Annual rounds of MDA with effective coverage (≥65% of the eligible population) are crucial for eliminating LF from endemic areas, as this approach proves highly cost-effective, particularly in countries with limited healthcare resources.10 To achieve LF elimination by 2027, three years ahead of the global target, the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, launched the nationwide Sarva Dawa Sevan or MDA campaign to eliminate LF in February 2023.11 Under this program, high-burden districts were identified, and healthcare workers administered anti-filarial medicine (Diethylcarba- mazine and albendazole) door-to-door to all eligible individuals in the selected administrative blocks.11 The campaign aimed to halt disease transmission through the widespread distribution of anti-filarial drugs in endemic districts throughout the country. Among the ten states and union territories, Madhya Pradesh (MP) was identified as a high-burden state for LF. Umaria was one of the eight districts selected for MDA rounds in 2023.11
Assessing and analyzing the implementation of MDA will facilitate identifying coverage compliance and reasons for non-compliance, enabling the program to address shortcomings and improve future MDA implementation.6 Treatment coverage rates obtained through treatment coverage evaluation surveys are pivotal in guiding the MDA program.6 Additionally, this evaluation aims to gather information on people's awareness of the program during the coverage surveys. Considering this background, the present evaluation was conducted to estimate the coverage and compliance and to explore the challenges of MDA in Umaria district, Madhya Pradesh, India in 2023.
Methodology
Setting: District Umaria is situated in the eastern part of Madhya Pradesh, approximately 500 km away from the state capital, Bhopal. It has a total population of 6,44,758, with 17.2% residing in urban areas. The average literacy rate in Umaria is 65.9%, with male literacy at 72.9% and female literacy at 44.5%. The district is divided into three administrative blocks: Karkeli, Manpur, and Pali.12 Table 1 provides the estimated population and eligible population for each administrative block in Umaria for 2023.
Block Name (IU) | Urban units | Rural units | Total Population | Eligible Population |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pali | 01 | 105 | 114202 | 102781 |
Karkeli | 03 | 274 | 325721 | 293148 |
Manpur | 01 | 211 | 243048 | 218743 |
Total | 05 | 590 | 682971 | 614672 |
Study Participants: The study included all eligible individuals from selected households who met the criteria for MDA participation. The eligible population consisted of all residents of the district aged two years or older, excluding pregnant women, children under two years of age, and seriously ill patients, in accor-dance with the guidelines.9 The MDA campaign occurred in the district from February 10th to 22nd, 2023. The campaign began as a booth-level activity at schools and residential hostels for the first few days, followed by outreach activities, and concluded with three days devoted to mop-up activities to maximize coverage.
Study Type: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study.
Sampling and Sample Size: Cluster sampling was employed, with the administrative block serving as the unit of evaluation (IU). As the district of Umaria has only three administrative blocks, all three were selected as IUs based on the guidelines of the National Programme for Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis (NPELF). As per guidelines, minimum four IUs has to be selected from the district and after that four clusters has to be selected from each IU. Because Umaria has only three adminis-trative blocks hence all three blocks were selected as IUs for the present evaluation survey. To ensure adequate representation of each block, four clusters were randomly selected. Among these clusters, three were from rural areas and one was from an urban area. Within each cluster, 30 households were selected using a sampling interval. Consequently, each IU had a sample size of 120 households (4 clusters x 30 house-holds), and the coverage evaluation survey for the district included 360 households. The process of cluster selection is summarized in Figure 1.
Training of Evaluation Team: The evaluation team consisted of faculty members from the medical college, interns, and research assistants affiliated with the institute's research projects. The institute's faculty members conducted a full-day training session on the data collection process on May 23, 2023.
Data Collection Schedule and Method: Information regarding MDA coverage was collected using a pre-designed and pretested paper-based questionnaire provided by the NPELF, which is uniformly used across all high-endemic districts in the country (9). Clusters were randomly selected, and households were chosen according to the sampling interval. The data collection process in the field was facilitated by the Multipurpose Health Worker and supported by the Accredited Social Health Activist, Anganwadi Worker, and Community Health Officers stationed in the field. A review of previous years' MDA records was also conducted. The study period was from May 24th to 30th, 2023.
Variables and Analysis: The collected data was extracted into an Excel file and analyzed using EpiData software (version 2.2.2.183 for analysis, EpiData Association, Odense, Denmark). Categorical variables were described in proportions, and continuous vari-ables were described as means. Descriptive analysis was performed for the quantitative data.
Ethical Consideration: The study was conducted as part of the routine evaluation of the National Programme for Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis by the district health system. The Institutional Ethical and Review Committee of the Government Medical College, Shahdol, Madhya Pradesh, India, approved the study (IERC/23/06/001 dated 30/06/2023).
Results
A total of 12 clusters comprising 360 households were visited by the evaluation team in the three administrative blocks (IUs). Information regarding MDA was obtained for 1,606 participants. According to the guidelines, 78 participants were found to be non-eligible, 14 were absent during the MDA, and 9 reported having a reason not to receive MDA. Remaining 1,505 participants were offered MDA, and 1,503 consumed the medication in front of healthcare workers (Figure 2).
Table 2 presents the background characteristics of the household survey conducted to measure MDA cover-age for LF. In Karkeli and Manpur IUs, there were 565 respondents each, while in the Pali IU, there were 476 respondents. Among the beneficiaries, 65% fell into the age group of 18 to 64 years. Approximately 24% of beneficiaries had no formal education, and 31% provided information for themselves. Of the beneficia-ries, 5% reported never consuming MDA, 4% con-sumed it for the first time, 20% consumed it twice, and 78% consumed it more than two times (Table 2).
Background characteristics of household survey | Karkelin(%) | Manpurn(%) | Pali n(%) | Total n(%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age | |||||
>2 to 17 | 160(36) | 170(38) | 114(26) | 444(100) | |
18-59 | 365(35) | 348(33) | 327(31) | 1040(100) | |
≥ 60 | 40(33) | 47(38) | 35(29) | 122(100) | |
Gender | |||||
Male | 294(36) | 268(33) | 247(30) | 809(100) | |
Female | 271(34) | 297(38) | 229(29) | 797(100) | |
Family size (Mean) | 4.7 | 4.7 | 3. 9 | 4. 4 | |
Education | |||||
No formal education | 152(40) | 140(36) | 92(24) | 384(100) | |
Primary | 109(47) | 74(32) | 47(20) | 230(100) | |
Secondary | 232(37) | 201(32) | 191(31) | 624(100) | |
Higher secondary | 48(25) | 83(43) | 60(31) | 191(100) | |
Graduation | 21(14) | 62(41) | 67(45) | 150(100) | |
Post-graduation | 3(11) | 5(19) | 19(70) | 27(100) | |
Information provided by | |||||
Self | 188(37) | 177(35) | 137(27) | 502(100) | |
Family member | 377(34) | 388(35) | 339(31) | 1104(100) | |
Number of times consumed drugs under MDA (including this time) | |||||
Never | 31(37) | 40(48) | 13(15) | 84(100) | |
1 time | 35(50) | 17(24) | 18(26) | 70(100) | |
2 times | 126(40) | 117(37) | 71(23) | 314(100) | |
>2 times | 373(33) | 391(34) | 374(33) | 1138(100) |
Out of the total 1,606 beneficiaries interviewed in the district, the coverage of MDA was found to be 94%. Individual coverage rates were 93% for Karkeli IU, 93% for Manpur IU, and 95% for Pali IU. Among the 101 beneficiaries who did not receive MDA, 52 were less than two years old, nine were pregnant women, and 17 were ill patients. Therefore, the district coverage for MDA was 98.6% for both drugs. The consumption rate at the district level was also 98.5%. Less than one percent of beneficiaries reported experiencing side effects, with the most common side effect being nausea and vomiting, followed by general weakness, skin rash, and others. A total of 101 beneficiaries reported not being offered MDA due to the reasons mentioned above, and all those who were offered MDA consumed it in front of healthcare workers, resulting in a compli-ance and consumption rate of 99.5% among the eligible population (Table 3).
Coverage & compliance of household information | Karkeli n(%) | Manpur n(%) | Pali n(%) | Total n(%)# | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Offered DEC | |||||
Yes | 528(93) | 525(93) | 452(95) | 1505(94) | |
No | 37(7) | 40(7) | 24(5) | 101(6) | |
Chewed & consumed DEC | |||||
Yes | 526(93) | 525(93) | 452(95) | 1503(93) | |
No | 36(6) | 5(1) | 23(5) | 64(4) | |
Do not know | 3(0) | 35(6) | 1(0) | 39(2) | |
Offered Albendazole | |||||
Yes | 528(93) | 525(93) | 452(95) | 1505(94) | |
No | 37(7) | 40(7) | 24(5) | 101(6) | |
Chewed & consumed Albendazole | |||||
Yes | 526(93) | 525(93) | 452(95) | 1503(93) | |
No | 36(6) | 5(1) | 23(5) | 64(4) | |
Do not know | 3(0) | 35(6) | 1(0) | 39(2) | |
Adverse event after MDA$ | |||||
None | 553(98) | 564(99) | 474(99) | 1591(99) | |
Nausea & vomiting | 7(1) | 0(0) | 2(0) | 9(0.5) | |
General weakness | 2(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 2(0) | |
Skin rash | 1(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | 1(0) | |
Other | 2(0) | 1(0) | 0(0) | 0(0) | |
Reason MDA was not offered## | |||||
Not eligible^^ | 31(5) | 37(6) | 10(2) | 78(5) | |
Absent during MDA | 5(0) | 1(0) | 8(1) | 14(1) | |
Other | 2(0) | 1(0) | 6(1) | 9(0.5) |
Regarding awareness about the information education, and communication (IEC) activities prior to the MDA campaign in the community, 85% of beneficiaries reported having prior information about the MDA activity in the district (Figure 3).
In terms of the source of information about LF, 97% of beneficiaries reported being aware of it. The primary source of information was the Accredited Social Health Activist, either alone or with volunteers, as reported by 90% of beneficiaries. Three percent of beneficiaries reported the Anganwadi Worker as the source of information about LF prior to MDA (Figure 4).
When asked about the cause of LF, 51% of respon-dents (822 out of 1,606) reported not knowing. Thirty percent of respondents correctly identified mosquito bites as the cause of LF, while 13% reported that it is caused by mosquito bites along with other factors. Six percent of respondents believed that LF is caused by factors other than mosquito bites (Table 3).
Discussion
Key findings: The present study focuses on the coverage and compliance of MDA for LF in Umaria district, Madhya Pradesh. Among the 360 households surveyed, information regarding 1,606 beneficiaries was obtained. MDA was offered to 94% of the total population and 98.5% of the eligible population. During the Feb 2023 MDA round, healthcare workers provided the drugs to all eligible individuals and emphasized the importance of consuming and chewing them in their presence, resulting in a coverage and consumption rate of 98.5%. The most common reasons for not consuming the drugs were ‘not being present at home during the campaign’ and ‘fear of drugs’. Less than one percent of beneficiaries reported experiencing any side effects after consuming MDA, with nausea, vomiting, and general weakness being the most commonly reported adverse effects.
While exploring the effectiveness of information, education, and communication activities prior to the MDA campaign, 85% of beneficiaries reported being aware of the MDA round that year, with ASHA workers being the main source of information (90%). However, only half of the beneficiaries (51%) were correctly aware that mosquito bites cause LF.
Overall, the findings indicate high coverage and compliance with MDA in the district. The proactive approach of healthcare workers in ensuring beneficia-ries consumed the drugs and the low reported side effects suggest the success of the MDA campaign. However, the study also highlights the need to improve awareness regarding the cause of LF, as only half of the beneficiaries were aware of its association with mosquito bites.
Strengths and Limitations: This study possesses several strengths. One strength is that it addresses a gap in the recent evaluation of the MDA campaign for the LF program, particularly in Madhya Pradesh. The program has undergone strategy changes, such as conducting booths at schools and implementing a mop- up round during the final phase of the MDA, which distinguishes it from previous years. Consequently, this study contributes valuable insights to the National Program to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis in M.P.11 However, there are certain limitations to consider. Firstly, the evaluation was conducted three months after the MDA campaign, which inevitably introduces inherent recall bias. Participants may not accurately recall specific details or experiences related to the campaign during this time lapse. Despite this limitation, the study provides valuable information regarding coverage and compliance rates of MDA in the district.
Relevance of Key Findings: The findings of this study hold significant relevance in the context of India's goal to eliminate LF by the year 2027. To achieve this ambitious target, it is crucial to sustain efforts similar to those highlighted in this study. Additionally, considering the success observed, it may be beneficial for India to contemplate the implementation of a second consecutive round of annual surveys in endemic implementation units, a strategy adopted by many other coun-tries.13,14 Additionally, the booth-level MdA strategy has demonstrated immense effectiveness in optimizing coverage. The utilization of booths, particularly in school settings, has proven to be an advantageous approach. It has not only facilitated accessibility but also improved the overall reach and impact of the MDA campaign.
Implications: This is an opportune moment for the National Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis to consider the implementation of Transmission Assessment Surveys.15 TAS can be specifically designed to assist the program in identifying endemic areas that have reached the critical threshold of LF infection. As the program progresses towards elimination, it becomes imperative to include children between the ages of five and seven in the survey. By surveying this age group, the program can ensure their protection from LF infection, provided that the MDA has effectively interrupted recent transmission.6 Furthermore, despite achieving optimal coverage in the district, there is still ample room for enhancing Information, Education, and Communication activities. Strengthening these activities will help generate increased demand for and ultimately improve the coverage of MDA.
Conclusion
In pursuit of the goal to eliminate LF by 2027, the MDA campaign was launched in February 2023. This campaign aimed to eliminate LF by administering anti-filaria medicine (DEC and albendazole) to all eligible populations through door-to-door visits by healthcare workers. This study provides insights into the coverage and compliance of MDA among beneficiaries in the Umaria district. The evaluation employed a cluster sampling method, selecting four clusters from the district's three Implementation Units (IUs). Within each IU, one cluster was from an urban area, while the remaining clusters were randomly selected from rural areas.
Among the 360 households surveyed in the district, information regarding 1,606 beneficiaries was obtained. MDA was offered to 94% of the total population and 98.5% of the eligible population. During the MDA round in February 2023, healthcare workers offered the drugs to all eligible individuals and ensured that the beneficiaries consumed and chewed the medication in their presence, resulting in a coverage and consumption rate of 98.5%. Among those who did not consume the drugs, the most common reasons reported were being absent from home during the campaign and fear of drugs. Less than one percent of beneficiaries reported experiencing any side effects following the consumption of MDA, with nausea, vomiting, and general weakness being the most frequently reported adverse effects.
The effectiveness of Information, Education, and Communication activities prior to the MDA campaign was explored, and 85% of the beneficiaries reported being aware of the MDA round taking place that year. The primary source of this information was the ASHA worker (90%). However, only half of the beneficiaries (51%) had correct awareness that mosquito bites are the cause of LF.
These findings shed light on the progress and chal-lenges of the MDA campaign in the Umaria district. It highlights the high coverage achieved but still need to address barriers such as absence during the campaign and fear of drugs among the non-compliant population. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of enhancing IEC activities to improve knowledge and awareness about LF transmission.
Recommendations: Based on the study's findings, the following recommendations are suggested:1) Continuing the One-week Campaign Approach: The one-week campaign with booth-level arrangements at schools and hostels proved effective in reaching a significant number of beneficiaries. This approach should be continued in subsequent years as it helps optimise the coverage and accessibility of the MDA campaign. 2) Encouraging Direct Drug Consumption: The strategy of insisting that beneficiaries to consume the drugs in front of healthcare workers has shown positive results in terms of compliance. This approach should be main-tained in future MDA campaigns as it promotes accountability and ensures that the medications are properly taken. 3) Conducting Night Surveys in Endemic Villages: To further enhance the coverage and reach of the MDA campaign, it is recommended to conduct more night surveys in villages that are endemic for LF. This will help identify individuals who might be missed during the daytime surveys and ensure a more comprehensive coverage. 4) Involving Local Leaders: Engaging religious and political leaders at the local level is crucial for sustaining community commitment towards LF elimination. Their involvement can help generate awareness, mobilize community participation, and reinforce the importance of the MDA cam-paign. Collaborating with these leaders will strengthen community engagement and support in the ongoing efforts to eliminate LF.
Implementing these recommendations will contribute to the overall success of the LF elimination program and help India progress towards achieving its goal of LF elimination by 2027.
Acknowledgement
We appreciate the efforts of Dr Milind Shiralkar, CEO and Dean and Dr. Pragati Chavan, Professor & Head, Department of community Medicine, Birsa Munda Government Medical College Shahdol for his support and co-operation in the pursuit of research studies undertaken by this department. We convey sincere thanks to the Mayank Shrivavtav, research assistant who supported immensely for the data collection who worked hard and sincerely for the data collection in scorching summer. We sincerely express our gratitude towards the healthcare staff of district Umaria for their tireless support during the evaluation process, espe-cially all MTS; Mr Chakradhar Pathak, Mr Dheerendra Kumar Mishra and Mr Jitendra Bimjhi.
References
- Global programme to eliminate lymphatic filariasis: progress report, 2020. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2021;96:497-508.
- [Google Scholar]
- Facilitators and barriers in implementation of mass drug administration for lymphatic filariasis elimination in India: A protocol for systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. J Fam Med Prim Care Wolters Kluwer-Medknow Publications; 2022; 11 : 3844
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Understanding the community impact of lymphatic filariasis: a review of the sociocultural literature. Bull World Health Organ Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85:493-8.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morbidity management in the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis: a review of the scientific literature. Filaria J BioMed Central. 2007;6:2.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lymphatic Filariasis: Training In Monitoring And Epidemiological Assessment Of Mass Drug Administration For Eliminating Lymphatic Filariasis Global Programme To Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis World Health Organization. Geneva Switzerland; 2013.
- [Google Scholar]
- Lymphatic filariasis elimination: progress in global programme development. Ann Trop Med Parasitol Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2002;96(Suppl 2):15-40.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lymphatic filariasis: Treatment, control and elimination. Adv Parasitol Adv Parasitol. 2006;61:395-441.
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Monitoring and epidemiological assessment of mass drug administration in the global programme to eliminate lymphatic filariasis: a manual for national elimination programmes. Geneva Switzerland; 2020
- [Google Scholar]
- Investment success in public health: an analysis of the cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit of the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis. Clin Inf Dis. 2017;64:728-735. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw835
- [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ministry of Health & Family Welfare launches nationwide Sarva Dawa Sevan or Mass Drug Administration campaign to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India 2023
- [Google Scholar]
- Census of India: Umaria District Population, Madhya Pradesh - Census India 2011. Office of registrar General & Census Commissioner, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India 2021
- [Google Scholar]
- Where there's a will, there's a way: Jharkhand offers cure in a bowl. South East Asia, WHO 2021 Available from: https://www.who.int/india/news/feature-stories/detail/where-there-s-a-will-there-s-a-way-jharkhand-offers-cure-in-a-bowl (accessed )
- [Google Scholar]
- Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. (https://apps.who.int/iris/ bitstream/handle/10665/259381/97892415 50161-eng.pdf?sequence=1, (accessed )
- Filarial antigenemia surveys: a manual for survey planners [draft document dated January 2011. available at: http://www.filariasis.us/
- [Google Scholar]