Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Note
FOREWORD
From the Editor's Desk
Invited Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Original Article
Original Research
Photoessay
Pictorial Review
Point of View
Review Article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Communication
Case Report
Case Series
Current Issue
Editorial
Editorial Note
FOREWORD
From the Editor's Desk
Invited Editorial
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Original Article
Original Research
Photoessay
Pictorial Review
Point of View
Review Article
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/FH_42_2025

Health system barriers to effective implementation of maternal and child health programs

Department of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

* Corresponding author: Mr. Prakash Garhwal, Department of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India. Prakashgarhwal044@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Garhwal P, Podder L, Bhardwaj G, Dora AK. Health system barriers to effective implementation of maternal and child health programs. Future health. doi: 10.25259/FH_42_2025

Abstract

Despite substantial global investments, the implementation of maternal and child health (MCH) programs in low- and middle-income countries continues to be hindered by systemic health system barriers. This review synthesizes evidence from 18 peer-reviewed studies to identify eight major barriers: inadequate infrastructure, shortage of skilled health workforce, weak information systems, governance and policy failures, socio-cultural barriers, supply chain interruptions, poor community engagement, and insecurity in conflict zones. These challenges are interlinked, often compounding one another and leading to limited-service coverage, delayed care-seeking, and poor health outcomes. Strengthening infrastructure, investing in the health workforce, reforming governance, improving financing mechanisms, and promoting culturally sensitive community engagement are critical to achieving equitable and sustainable improvements in maternal and child health outcomes.

Keywords

Barriers
Health schemes
MCH
Public health
Utilization

INTRODUCTION

Maternal and child health (MCH) is a foundational pillar of global public health systems, yet persistent disparities in maternal and neonatal outcomes continue to exist, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Globally, approximately 810 women die every day from preventable causes related to pregnancy and childbirth, while millions of children die before their fifth birthday, most from treatable conditions.1-2 Although numerous maternal and child health programs have been introduced at national and subnational levels, their impact is often compromised due to systemic implementation challenges. These challenges are embedded in the structural and functional components of health systems, including workforce capacity, service availability, supply chains, financing mechanisms, and governance frameworks.3-6

This topic is significant because the inability to effectively implement MCH programs has direct consequences on mortality, morbidity, and long-term developmental outcomes for both mothers and children. Despite global efforts to reduce maternal mortality to less than 70 per 100,000 live births and end preventable child deaths by 2030 under Sustainable Development Goal 3 (SDG 3).7 Reviewing and analyzing health system-related barriers is therefore critical to inform policy and guide programmatic improvements at all levels of the healthcare system.

This review paper explores the systemic bottlenecks across key health system domains, including infrastructure, human resources, financing, information systems, governance, and sociocultural determinants. The review focuses on synthesizing both common patterns and context-specific challenges that limit the accessibility, quality, and sustainability of MCH services. Particular attention is given to how these barriers disproportionately impact underserved and vulnerable populations, as highlighted in multiple studies.2,8,9

Search methodology

A structured literature search was conducted across four databases: PubMed, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. The search covered studies published between 2010 and 2023. Keywords used included MCH, barriers, health systems, health schemes, maternal morbidity, mortality, and public health. Both qualitative and quantitative peer-reviewed studies were considered. Inclusion criteria were: (a) studies focusing on health system barriers to MCH program implementation; (b) published in English and with full text available in the open domain. Exclusion criteria included editorials and studies not directly addressing MCH program implementation. A total of 42 studies were screened, of which 18 met the eligibility criteria and were included in this review.

The paper is structured into three main sections. After the introduction, eight key barriers were identified from the selected literature, each representing a core barrier within the health system that impedes the effective implementation of MCH programs. This is followed by a synthesis and discussion of the findings in the broader context of global health targets and equity considerations. Finally, the conclusion provides a summary of key insights, implications for health systems strengthening, and future directions for research, policy, and practice aimed at advancing maternal and child health outcomes in resource-constrained settings.

EXISTING BARRIERS

Inadequate health infrastructure

Multiple studies emphasize that inadequate health infrastructure significantly affects the delivery of quality maternal and child health services. Many rural facilities lack not only electricity (35%) and clean water but also basic sanitation and well-equipped delivery rooms essential for safe childbirth.1,4 Poor infrastructure, including a lack of emergency transport (48%), limits timely referrals for obstetric complications.10 Additionally, notes that infrastructural weaknesses often result in overcrowded and unsanitary conditions (40%), increasing infection risks for mothers and newborns. Such deficiencies directly affect service quality and utilization by women in need of skilled care.1

Shortage of skilled health workforce

The shortage (61%) and maldistribution of skilled health workers are chronic problems cited across several studies. Studies report how many regions, especially rural and marginalized communities, face critical shortages of midwives, nurses, and obstetricians.5,11 Insufficient pre-service training and limited in-service capacity building contribute to a workforce that may lack updated skills.3 High attrition rates due to poor working conditions (25%), low salaries, and burnout.5 The imbalance of provider-to-patient ratios leads to compromised quality of care and increased maternal and neonatal risks.9 Gender preferences sometimes result in reluctance to seek care when female providers are unavailable.12

Weak health information systems

The role of health information systems in supporting MCH program success is underscored.6,11,13 Lack of digital infrastructure and trained personnel to manage health data efficiently.11 Additionally, weak feedback loops limit the use of data for corrective action, reducing responsiveness (70%) to community needs.13 Poor information systems led to the delayed identification of high-risk pregnancies (40%), affecting timely interventions.5

Governance and policy failures

Governance and policy issues are recurrent barriers identified by Studies.7,13-15 Decentralization without adequate capacity-building results in inconsistent service quality and coordination challenges.14 Political instability and shifting priorities lead to underfunded MCH initiatives.7 Inefficient fund management (40%) and bureaucratic delays that slow program roll-out.15 Accountability mechanisms that hinder performance monitoring and transparency, reducing the overall effectiveness of maternal and child health policies.13

Socio-cultural barriers

Gender inequities and male dominance (58%) in household decision-making as major constraints.8 Studies report that cultural stigma (46%) surrounding pregnancy and childbirth deters women from attending health facilities.2 Literature reveals that provider gender mismatch and language barriers further restrict access in conservative and minority communities. Mistrust of formal healthcare systems and reliance on traditional birth attendants as factors influencing care-seeking behaviors.10

Supply chain interruptions

Studies report frequent interruptions in the supply of essential drugs, vaccines, and equipment as critical barriers.10,13,16,17 Inefficient procurement processes and poor forecasting lead to frequent stock-outs (46%).16 Some studies report logistical challenges related to storage and distribution, especially in remote areas.10 Supply interruptions affect immunization programs and emergency obstetric care (27%).17 Disruptions undermine community trust in the health system and reduce consistent care-seeking behaviors.13

Poor community engagement and awareness

Community engagement and awareness issues are discussed in Studies.9,15,17,18 Low health literacy and misinformation as major factors reducing demand for MCH services. For instance, in rural Ethiopia, low maternal health literacy and widespread misinformation were found to reduce demand for antenatal and delivery care.6 Lack of culturally appropriate communication materials (52%) tailored to local languages and beliefs.17 Studies report insufficient involvement of community leaders and influencers in promoting health programs (20%), limiting outreach.18 Evidence from Nepal further shows insufficient involvement of community leaders and influencers, limiting outreach and reducing acceptance of facility-based care.15 In India, mistrust of healthcare providers, especially among marginalized groups, has been associated with a continued preference for traditional birth attendants despite the availability of institutional services.4 These findings underscore that community-related barriers are not uniform but vary significantly across geographical contexts. Strengthening locally tailored communication, involving trusted community actors, and fostering participatory engagement strategies are therefore essential to improve MCH program acceptance and utilization.13

Insecurity and conflict zones

Some studies explain how displacement and insecurity restrict women’s ability to access health facilities and delay emergency care.2 Health workers often avoid insecure areas due to safety concerns, worsening the shortage.7 Studies show that humanitarian health responses sometimes fail to fully integrate maternal and child health services, leading to gaps in care during crises.18

CONCLUSION

The synthesis of evidence highlights that while MCH programs are well conceptualized in many settings, operationalization falters due to systemic gaps. The most critical insights include the centrality of a skilled and adequately distributed health workforce, the need for reliable health information systems for decision-making, and the persistent role of financial and socio-cultural barriers in limiting service uptake. These findings emphasize that technical solutions alone are insufficient without addressing deeper governance, equity, and social determinants of health issues that hinder program effectiveness. To address these barriers, future efforts must focus on building resilient and integrated health systems. Key strategies should include investing in health infrastructure and workforce development, strengthening data and supply chain systems, and implementing financial risk protection mechanisms. Furthermore, engaging communities through culturally sensitive approaches and improving governance and intersectoral collaboration are essential for ensuring equitable access and sustained improvements. Addressing these systemic issues holistically will be critical for achieving Sustainable Development Goal 3 and improving maternal and child health outcomes globally.

Author contribution

PG: Conceptualization of topic, design and structure of review, drafting of initial manuscript, literature search, responding to reviewers’ comments; LP, GB and AKD: Critical analysis and interpretation of data, reviewing and editing of manuscript, helped refine arguments on health system barriers; All authors approved the final version.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent

Patient’s consent not required as there are no patients in this study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

References

  1. , , , . Factors associated with maternal healthcare services utilization in nine high focus states in India: A multilevel analysis based on 14 385 communities in 292 districts. Health Policy Plan. 2014;29:542-59.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , et al. Assessment of implementation and effectiveness of Malawi’s health surveillance assistant cadre: A national mixed methods study. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4:e001817.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . Economic status, education and empowerment: Implications for maternal health service utilization in developing countries. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11190.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . A regional multilevel analysis: Can skilled birth attendants uniformly decrease neonatal mortality? Matern Child Health J. 2014;18:242-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Health facility service availability and readiness to provide basic emergency obstetric and newborn care in a low-resource setting: Evidence from a Tanzania National Survey. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e020608.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , . Inequalities in maternal health service utilization in Ethiopia: Evidence from Demographic and Health Survey 2016. Int J Equity Health. 2021;20:18.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  7. , . Utilization and determinants of maternal and child health services in Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e046438.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  8. . Determinants of stillbirths in Ghana: Does quality of antenatal care matter? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:132.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , . Adherence to evidence-based protocols in public health facilities in Rajasthan, India. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:829.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , . Focused antenatal care in Tanzania: Delivering individualised, targeted, high-quality care. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014;2:14-25.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , . Poor Quality for Poor Women? Inequities in the quality of antenatal and delivery care in Kenya. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0171236.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , . Utilization of antenatal care and associated factors among women in Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21:236.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , . Factors associated with maternal mortality in Malawi: Application of the three delays model. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17:219.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , et al. Antenatal care in rural Bangladesh: Gaps in adequate coverage and content. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0205149.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , . Availability and readiness of health facilities for maternal and newborn services in Nepal: Analysis of the 2015 health facility survey. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:1369.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  16. . Factors influencing the utilization of antenatal care content in Uganda. Australas Med J. 2011;4:516-26.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , et al. Does proximity of women to facilities with better choice of contraceptives affect their contraceptive utilization in rural Ethiopia? PLoS One. 2017;12:e0187311.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , . Barriers to obstetric care at health facilities in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2015;4:4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections